| |
By Philip S. Chua, M.D., FACS, FPCS
A Prelude
I
have been assigned the task of presenting this paper as a
prelude to a discussion of a most delicate and essential dilemma
confronting medical education and healthcare delivery in our
country today. It is my hope that a thoughtful and candid
evaluative deliberation of the national crisis, will allow
all of us to help find ways to minimize, if not to solve,
at least, the crisis in our own backyard. Click here
The alumni are concerned. And I am sure the administration
and faculty as well. All this, because we all hold dear to
heart our Alma Mater, its reputation and its future. I want
to remind everyone present here today, that we are deliberating
here as members of one family. We are family. And our common
and mutual goal is nothing but the welfare, interest, and
future of our medical school and the medical center, and the
quality of our medical graduates. Needless to say, we all
want our medical school and our graduates to be the best.
We all want good medical care and healthcare delivery system
for our country and our people.
The physical health of
the nation and its citizenry largely depends on the quality
of physicians, state of available technology and facilities,
and the efficiency in the delivery of healthcare in the country,
besides the habits and lifestyle of the people.
On top of our more than
6.3% inflation rate and national budget deficit of 3.407 trillion
pesos, the Philippines is also facing another crisis of alarming
proportion: the deteriorating quality of medical education,
and the imminent healthcare dilemma.
Is there a crisis in medical
education and an impending one in the delivery of healthcare
in the Philippines? My answer to both is yes. It has been
reported that the earliest and subtle warning signs of the
tsunami earthquake-tidal wave phenomenon that recently devastated
a great portion of the Far East were not heeded, leading to
the demise of more than 150,000 people. We have more than
subtle signs of a crisis in medical education and a looming
one in healthcare delivery system in the Philippines. We cannot
afford to close our eyes, stick our head in the sand and pretend
they are not happening. We have to pay attention to the warning
signs, no matter how subtle they may be.
Only
51.4% passed the medical licensure board examination in August
2004; 51.94% in the examination given February 2004; 55.69%
in August 2003; 57.23% in February 2003; 59.11% in August
2002; 66.03% in February 2002; and, 64.3% in August 2001.
And this reflects the performance of all graduates from the
various medical schools.
The long overdue clarion
call was sounded by concerned physicians and medical educators
in the country. Dr. Jose Ramirez, head of the Philippine Regulation
Commission’s (PRC) Board of Medicine, recently spoke
of this crisis of continued runaway decline in the passing
rate in a forum on “Medical Education in the Philippines,”
sponsored by the National Academy of Science and Technology.
The PRC board “worries that the quality of medical education
in our country may have deteriorated in recent years, influenced
by the unchecked proliferation of (fly-by-night) medical schools
and of (their) pirating faculty members from established schools.”
The PRC chief explains the decline to be partly a result of
the “deterioration in the admission and screening of
prospective medical student applicants.” Obviously,
a number of these schools are less than discriminating in
their admission in order to “get the maximum enrollees
in for maximum financial profit,” since they are apparently,
first and foremost, a money-making business venture, with
the secondary objective of providing medical education.
Part
of this unfortunate generic scenario is cost-cutting and skimping
on facilities (audiovisual teaching aids, books, equipment),
inadequate and/or poorly structured medical educational curriculum,
the lack of competent fulltime and truly dedicated teachers,
the lack of good hospital affiliation, and the commercial
bottom-line philosophy of these inferior institutions that
results in substandard quality of teaching.
In the 1950s, there were
only 3 medical schools in the country. In the 60s, there were
7 medical schools (UP, UST, FEU, UE, MCU, CIM and SWU). The
passing rates then were high up in the 80s and 90s.
Thoughtless and misguided
actions by the Local Government Units (LGU) in the 1970s “encouraged
the private sectors to finance medical schools in their localities
to address the shortage of doctors in the rural areas,”
since 40% of medical graduates migrated to America. Medical
schools sprouted all over the country like the proverbial
mushroom. This ill-conceived notion did not significantly
alleviate the problem. The mal distribution of physicians
and medical care was a bit improved when the United States
closed its doors to foreign physicians in 1975 and the “saturation
and congestion” of physicians in the big cities forced
some to practice in the rural areas. But that effect was just
a drop in the bucket. Most of our rural areas are still doctorless.
Many new graduates who found the situation to be untenable
for survival were forced to seek greener pastures outside
of the Philippines, or outside of their profession.
In the meantime, the
unabated replication of medical schools in the country has
progressively led to substandard teaching, poor quality medical
education, and the inferior graduates that these institutions
are churning out as evidenced by the results of the medical
board examinations. The lack of competent faculty members
in the country prompted the new medical schools to pirate
teachers from reputable medical schools.
There are 36 medical
schools in the nation and 12 of them in the Metro Manila area
alone. For a country the size of the Philippines with its
86.2 million population, it needs no more than ten medical
schools to adequately serve the nation and its people.
Of these 36 schools only
19 (or 52%) have their own teaching hospital as required by
law. How the others obtained the necessary governmental license
to operate only highlights the flaws and inefficiencies in
the entire Philippine educational system and its regulatory
agencies.
If we had but ten medical
schools in the country, these institutions would have more
deserving applicants per school to select from, accept more
qualified students, become more profitable to afford quality
and dedicated teachers, superior facilities and teaching aids,
a hospital of their own, and be able to optimize its ability
to produce quality and world-class physicians. As it is today,
the good schools are negatively impacted by the mediocre ones,
who lure student applicants (thru various incentives) away
from quality medical schools which can provide them superior
medical education, and who pirate faculty members from good
schools.
If the current deplorable
situation continues, the Philippines will soon be notoriously
known, and shamefully tagged internationally, as the mecca
of medical diploma mills.
It is obvious that the Commission
on Higher Education (CHED) should take a great part of the
blame for the deterioration of medical education in the country.
CHED has obviously defaulted in its duties and obligations
of strictly monitoring and controlling tertiary education.
It is vested with all the powers needed, but apparently, politics,
whatever kind it is, always gets in the way. To deny this
is happening, to look the other way, and spare CHED this scathing
criticism, is to do a great disservice to the medical profession
and to our country and our people as a whole.
Problem-based learning (or
PBL) has somehow been tangentially mentioned as a possible
factor in the low passing average. There is really nothing
intrinsically wrong with PBL. If problem-based learning, which
is working well in great medical schools like Harvard and
others, is not working for our students, perhaps our students
are not serious, smart, mature and responsible enough to survive
without spoon feeding. At any rate, to dwell on this insignificant
issue is only to divert our attention from the real causes
of the crisis at hand.
To digress a bit, I would
like to touch on the imminent dilemma in healthcare delivery
in the Philippines. It is obvious that inferior medical graduates
leads to poorer quality physicians. This situation only aggravates
the country’s rapidly diminishing medical manpower resources.
Over the past several decades, physicians and nurses found
themselves in a quandary, a dilemma posed by our failing system
and deteriorating economy. With the survival of their family
and themselves at stake, the Filipino physicians and nurses
found no choice but to seek a greener pasture abroad. This
exodus continues to cause the Philippines not brain drain
anymore but brain hemorrhage of alarming proportion. More
than 250,000 (quarter of a million) Filipinos are applying
for passports every year, the majority of those, physicians
and nurses leaving for employment overseas. More than 10,000
of our physicians have pursued nursing education. More are
expected. Almost 4,000 physicians have migrated to the United
States between 1996 and 2002, an average attrition of about
700 a year. Between 1994 and 2003, 84,843 registered nurses
left for abroad, an average of about 9,500 annually. If this
hemorrhage continues, the healthcare delivery in the country
will be devastated, and the health of our people placed in
extreme jeopardy.
A British study predicts
a full blown crisis in healthcare delivery in the Philippines
by year 2008, for lack of competent physicians and nurses
to take care of ailing Filipinos. Hospitals in Negros and
other cities in the country find no choice but to close doors
for lack of medical-nursing manpower. And this is only the
beginning.
The recent anti-exodus pact
signed by around 6000 specialists in internal medicine at
the recently concluded 16th mid-year convention of the Philippine
College of Physicians in Bacolod is a welcome and laudable
band-aid on the large and gaping wound in our system. We need
more than a unilateral covenant like this. The onus is on
our national government. If only we had less corruption in
the government, perhaps our country would be solvent enough
to address this financially-related dilemma, and greatly minimize
the escape of these physicians and nurses seeking a greener
pasture elsewhere. After all, if given a choice, if a good
one is available, these physicians and nurses would rather
stay right here, at home, with their families and friends.
Most of them leave with a heavy heart, compelled by the harsh
reality at home. Only our government, perhaps joint venturing
with the private business sectors, can pre-empt and prevent
this imminent crisis in healthcare delivery in the Philippines.
In
summary, the complex multi-factorial etiologies of this national
crisis in medical education, in general, would include these
ten: (1) Over abundance of medical schools in the country,
many of which provide substandard medical education; (2) Admission
of poor quality of students; (3) Lack of competent fulltime
faculty, aggravated by piracy of teachers; (4) Unattractive
salary for fulltime faculty members, discouraging many qualified
ones from teaching; (5) Inadequate facilities and clinical
exposure; (6) Dereliction of duties on the part of the Commission
on Higher Education and other governmental agencies; (7) The
apparent “personalization” and seeming lack of
fairness on the part of the members of the board examiners,
who still utilize an antiquated system of examination; (8)
The indifference and ineffectiveness of medical associations,
association of medical colleges, specialty societies and the
like, to provide effective leadership and challenge what is
going on; (9) the harsh financial realities confronting medical
schools in the country today; and, to a major extent (10)
The dirty politics and rampant corruption in our government,
with the resultant rapidly deteriorating economy of the country.
All these are the leading causes of the crisis before us today.
Capping the ceiling at
36 is not even the answer. Since the present system and agencies
appear to be impotent in curbing the explosive growth of medical
schools in the country and in strictly implementing quality
control among these schools, perhaps President Gloria Arroyo
needs to create an oversight commission, composed of renowned
and respected Filipino medical educators in the academe and
in the clinical arena, specifically tasked to scrutinize under
the microscope the Commission on Higher Education, the Board
of Medical Examiners, and all other governmental agencies
involved, and replace their membership, if needed, and correct
whatever deficiencies these agencies have. And, obviously,
all the existing 36 medical schools should be strictly re-evaluated,
to weed out and close the non-compliant and substandard ones
- those which fall short of the established criteria and requirements
for a good medical school in the country.
To allow these 36 medical
schools to continue business as usual, without strictly mandating
quality control, is to place in jeopardy and harm’s
way, not only the good reputation of the Philippines and its
medical force, here and abroad, but the very health and well-being
of our nation and our people as a whole.
This
is the anatomy of this dreaded national disease. Some of the
10 factors I have listed above may also be at play, and applicable,
to our own Alma Mater. The goal of this forum is not to point
fingers or assign blames, but to analyze, as objectively as
we can, the crisis at hand as it applies to our own school,
and seek ways to improve ourselves to the best of our limited
abilities.
I am under no illusion
that the answers to these complex problems are simple and
easy. Far from it, because it is a glaring fact that the major
factor in all this is the political cancer of corruption which
have permeated into the very core of every agency in the government,
including even those involved in medical education and healthcare
delivery in this country. The same malignancy that dragged
our national economy a few decades ago, from the top in Asia,
just below Japan, spiraling all the way down second to the
bottom, just above Bangladesh today.
As
always, realities will, sooner or later, prevail. But reality
check should inspire us and not dampen our resolve. What is
important, though, is for us not to be derelict in our duties,
and to come together as a family, to give our best shot. After
all, whether we like it or not, this is our family, THIS is
our Alma Mater. And, ladies and gentlemen, THIS is our country.
_____________________________________________________
* Philip S. Chua,M.D., FACS, FPCS, is past Chairman
of the Board of the FEU-DNR School of Medicine Alumni Foundation
(2002-2004) and a member of the Board of Trustees of the FEU-Nicanor
Reyes Medical Foundation. He is currently Chairman of Cardiovascular
Surgery of the Cebu Cardiovascular Center, Cebu Doctors’
Hospital, Cebu City, Philippines, and the Vice President for
Far East Operations of the Cardiovascular Hospitals of America,
a builder of heart centers in the United States and in the
Far East, based in Wichita, Kansas. His email address is
Presented on January 21, 2005 at
the FEU-NRMF Medical Complex in West Fairview, Quezon City,
at the special joint luncheon-meeting (A Strategy for Innovation
and Excellence: 5-year Agenda) of the Board of Trustees of
the FEU-Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, the dean and faculty
of the FEU-NRMF School of Medicine, and the officers and members
of the FEU-NRMF Medical Alumni Society (Quezon City) and the
FEU-DNR School of Medicine Alumni Foundation (USA).
  
|
|